Dr. David Fowler, a former chief medical examiner in Maryland, testified in the Derek Chauvin trial that George Floyd’s death may not have been caused by Chauvin’s actions, sparking controversy. Consequently, Maryland’s Office of the Attorney General announced an audit to investigate in-custody deaths with similar circumstances to Floyd’s, focusing on potential bias within the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) under Fowler’s leadership. The audit aims to ensure adequate investigations and improve practices within OCME. Several cases involving questionable findings and biased narratives have been identified, raising concerns about systemic issues of pro-law enforcement bias.
There are widespread discrepancies in OCME reports, including the use of “excited delirium” to explain deaths in custody, a controversial and unscientific term. The audit may review cases influenced by excited delirium but could overlook many others unless all deaths due to cardiac conditions and drug use are analyzed. Furthermore, suicides and natural deaths in custody may have been improperly classified, indicating potential biases that need to be addressed. The audit faces challenges, and critics fear the limited scope may not lead to meaningful change.
The audit’s impact remains uncertain, as officials overseeing the investigation may have conflicts of interest. Families affected by these biased rulings may seek legal recourse, but the burden lies with them to uncover the truth. Reforms within OCME are underway following a settlement with the Black family, but significant changes are needed to ensure unbiased practices and transparency in determining cause of death. There are ongoing concerns about the accuracy and independence of OCME reports, highlighting the need for reform and accountability.
Source
Photo credit theappeal.org