In a controversial statement, Maryland Representative Andy Harris suggested that North Carolina should consider awarding its electoral votes to former President Donald Trump before the 2024 election. Harris made the remark during a town hall meeting, where he argued that Trump had been unfairly treated during the 2020 election and deserved a second chance to serve as president.
Harris’s comments have sparked backlash from political opponents and voting rights advocates, who argue that such a move would undermine the democratic process and disenfranchise millions of voters. North Carolina has traditionally followed a winner-takes-all system for awarding electoral votes, with the candidate who wins the most votes in the state receiving all of its electoral votes.
Critics of Harris’s proposal have pointed out that awarding electoral votes to a candidate before the election would set a dangerous precedent and could lead to chaos and confusion in future elections. They argue that the Electoral College system is designed to reflect the will of the people and changing the rules midstream would be undemocratic.
Harris’s remarks come at a time when many states are considering changes to their election laws in the wake of the 2020 election. Republicans have introduced a number of bills aimed at restricting access to voting, while Democrats are pushing for reforms to make the electoral process more transparent and equitable.
It remains to be seen whether North Carolina will consider Harris’s proposal or if it will stick with its current system of awarding electoral votes based on the results of the election. In the meantime, the debate over the future of the Electoral College and the integrity of the election process is likely to continue.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com