During the vice presidential debate, Sen. JD Vance promised to protect health insurance coverage for people with pre-existing conditions while suggesting the use of high-risk pools to separate them from healthier individuals. Experts view this proposal as a step back to a time before the Affordable Care Act when high-risk pools were used to provide coverage for chronically ill individuals. These pools were underfunded, leading to high premiums and coverage exclusions for patients with pre-existing conditions.
The ACA eliminated high-risk pools and implemented a single-risk pool model to ensure that younger, healthier individuals could offset the costs of older patients with chronic conditions. Experts believe that moving back to a high-risk pool model would require significant government subsidies to keep premiums affordable for sick individuals. However, the effectiveness and benefits of this approach remain unclear, especially if it relies heavily on federal funding.
Experts argue that sharing the risk broadly across a larger group is essential to make insurance affordable for everyone. They believe that reverting to isolated high-risk pools would not be a sustainable solution for providing coverage to individuals with pre-existing conditions. Ultimately, the debate highlights the challenges of finding a balance between ensuring coverage for the sickest patients while maintaining affordability and sustainability in the healthcare system.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
