The recent United Nations General Assembly resolution calling for Israel to end its illegal occupation of Palestinian territory within one year has been met with mixed reactions. While the vote was seen as a victory for Palestinian advocacy, the fact that 54 countries, constituting about 28 percent of all member states, did not support the resolution has raised concerns about moral courage and global hypocrisy.
The resolution, which was backed by 124 countries, demanded that Israel immediately end its unlawful presence in the occupied Palestinian territory. It reiterated the findings of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) which deemed Israel’s occupation and settlements on Palestinian land illegal, calling for reparations for damages incurred by Palestinians.
Despite clear international consensus on the criminal nature of occupation, some countries voted against or abstained from the resolution, implicitly endorsing Israel’s actions and violating international law. The US, a long-time supporter of the Israeli occupation, entered a “no” vote despite its representative at the ICJ supporting the court’s rulings.
The double standards displayed by countries like the US, UK, and Germany in supporting interventions against some occupations while turning a blind eye to Israel’s actions have raised questions about the integrity of the global legal framework. This inconsistency not only deepens divides between nations but also undermines the ability of international law to prevent atrocities.
To restore faith in international law and uphold human rights, countries must prioritize justice over strategic interests and hold each other accountable for violations, regardless of political affiliations. Only through unified and decisive action can the ideals of international law be upheld and the world saved from a lawless future.
Source
Photo credit www.aljazeera.com
